FINAL PROJECT: Abstract and Reader's Reponse > The Physics of Color Perception
J -- you are right that an expert often will probe at a text that is intended for a more general audience. You can, however, address this in part by doing two things:
1) use metadiscouse to say that this presentation is a simplification and
2) refer audience to the most authoritative sources that will handle this in detail.
(Your expert will read these, and give you some accommodation.)
---
How are your section headings coming?
1) use metadiscouse to say that this presentation is a simplification and
2) refer audience to the most authoritative sources that will handle this in detail.
(Your expert will read these, and give you some accommodation.)
---
How are your section headings coming?
May 7, 2015 |
Marybeth Shea
Reader Profile: I am imagining a reader well versed in the theory of color perception who realizes that many of the theories and explanations given in this article simplify the complex process of color perception.
Paragraph: The information contained in this paper, but it is a simplification of more complex issues. You need to explicitly state that the Young-Helmholtz theory is a major simplification of the workings of the visual perception and that there are competing theories that lead to the same results described by the theory. Part of the reason why there are multiple valid theories lies in the simplifying assumptions of Young-Helmholtz theory. The fact that there must be simplifying assumptions is obvious considering the fact that Young-Helmholtz theory was developed in the 1800’s and there have been extraordinary advances in physiology and microbiology since then. Edwin Land’s Retinex Theory is also a major simplification of complex processes. The theory itself provides a basic theory of color constancy, but it is solely based upon a few simple observational experiments and does not rely on advances made concerning the physiology of the eye and the brain.