FINAL PROJECT: Abstract and Reader's Reponse > Minimizing Electrical Grid Damage from Geomagnetic Storms: A Look at Northern Pennsylvania Policy
G -- you do not have to take this on fully, but what are the rough costs? And, who pays? As in, who owns the grid?
If you cannot address these big elephants in the living room, at least punt with some appropriate language: "...not the goal of this analysis..." and ""...important but beyond the scope of this technical analysis...." or some such phrase.
If you cannot address these big elephants in the living room, at least punt with some appropriate language: "...not the goal of this analysis..." and ""...important but beyond the scope of this technical analysis...." or some such phrase.
May 8, 2016 |
Marybeth Shea
Reader Profile:
I imagine the policy makers in northern Pennsylvania weighing the risks of GICs against the cost of preventing the damage of GICs.
Reader Response:
It looks like GICs are inevitable. It looks like GICs will cause damage to our physical electrical grid in the near future given that the sun goes through cycles of activity. Infrastructure improvement looks like a viable solution to the problem but what is the cost analysis? Is upgrading the grid worth the cost of fixing the damage? It seems that simply endorsing policy measures that are already in the works is an easy way to reduce the risks of GICs at little to no cost to consumers.