MbShea@PWP@English@UMCP

ABSTRACT: There is so much conflicting information available online and in person about customs and standards in theatre. Of course, from an experienced view, it’s obvious why this information conflicts: some information is designed for non-equity stage actors, some for equity stage actors, some for film actors, and some for TV actors. They all have different ways of operating. The formatting of resumes are different, what you do in an audition is different, and who you talk to and how you speak to them is different. The list goes on and on. Unfortunately, while the distinction in formality between these types of acting is obvious to people who have experience (you know, the people who write these documents). But, people who don’t have experience often don’t realize that there is a distinction (I certainly didn’t) and wonder why there are so many conflicting statements. My document will make it obvious that it’s designed for non-equity stage actors, but I will briefly touch on how things may differ in film, for example, in order to clear up ‘discrepancies.’
READER’S PROFILE: This is for someone who has specific questions about theatre, which they can look up in the table of contents.
READER’S RESPONSE: “Well, I’m glad I looked this up, I feel more comfortable going into this audition, now that I know what to expect.”
Or perhaps: “I mean, sure, but I wish they’d go more in depth in _______.”

P -- in this way, the definition (non equity actors) is essential to knit up the rest of the document. :)

For the reluctant reader, this document just helps you march into the profession. Then, your experience will become the greatest resource.

Document is to get started. Not to roadmap everything, right?

Will be fun for me -- a lapsed costumer worker -- to read.