FINAL PROJECT: Abstract and Reader's Reponse > A Data Scientist's Approach to Analyzing Maritime Data using Scikit-Learn
M and A,
If this data is already available, then the costs are relatively low. Can that condition help the reluctant reader in part? Also, will the reader need to start new data collection procedures?
Looks like a good plan; glad this work supports you both with Dr. D.
If this data is already available, then the costs are relatively low. Can that condition help the reluctant reader in part? Also, will the reader need to start new data collection procedures?
Looks like a good plan; glad this work supports you both with Dr. D.
May 7, 2017 |
Marybeth Shea
READER'S PROFILE: A reader who does not see the benefit in studying maritime data. Perhaps they do not believe in climate change. Or maybe they would rather we used our data science technologies to study and analyze a different data set. It is also possible that we might be dealing with an older reader who is already well-established in their field. The reader might be opposed to change and it is likely that he/she does not understand the benefits of data science. Perhaps, they are not aware of the implications and relevance of data science protocols and practices.
READER'S RESPONSE: I don’t see the benefits of studying maritime data. How do visualizations, trending time series, linear regressions, and geospatial analysis help with the analysis of maritime data? What relevant information would these analysis methods reveal? I think our time and resources would be better spent on analyzing other data sets. I am also skeptical of “data science” itself. How do we know these protocols are accurate and reliable in the first place? For years, we have been successfully analyzing data by simply conducting interviews and collecting data by hand. I do not see the benefits of bringing a data scientist on board. It would be nice if the author explained why data science is the most beneficial field for analyzing large data sets.