_____________________________________
Being a chemist. Oops, science is POWERFUL!

ENGL 390, 390H, and (sometimes) 398V  Class Journal

_____________________________________

Entries by Marybeth Shea (1076)

Week 2: class culture and some previews

Happy Monday!  The Chiefs and the '9ers headed to the Superb Owls event.  Puppy Bowl never disappoints.

Today, we will look at these resources, so that you are more confident about where we are going-->UPDATED LINKS 10:45 AM

  • These two slide sets
  • A visit to Eli Review (you DID watch the short video, right?) where I will show you selected pages from last semester.  My goal here is to show you that in the Eli Review Writing Prompt, I gather and link the teaching resources you will need to complete that assignment.  Strategic redundancy is an audience-friendly writing technique that you can imitate.
  • What is a mentor text and why should you care?
    • Think example. Students always request writing examples, especially exemplars.
    • Look at the whole via the frame of audience-centered work. Then,
    • Look at the writing craft choices that make this test work.  Note them and imitate selected ones for your work.
      • DO NOT COPY THE MENTOR TEXT WHOLE CLOTH.
  • How many assignments this semester?  Three assignments each with several required draft/peer revision iterations.  Within these three assignment processes, we will learn
    • cognitive and critical thinking frames, as well as
      • meta discourse
      • counting out
      • strategic redundancy
      • definition work before major content and within major content
      • curated hypertext links
      • cognitive wedge
    • writing craft choices like
      • voice
      • paragraph sizing
      • transitions between paragraphs
      • topic sentence strategies
      • colon v. semi colon
      • AND MORE, including how to cite properly for each context.  Hint: referral links are a type of semi-formation citation.  I use links in this teaching platform, for your convenience to GIVE CREDIT.  Pusheen is an example. 

Knitting up from last week.  Here is my favorite Science Pusheen just now. (Is a large image and you cick to see entirely WHEN you wish. FIXED on Friday,!Most on their phones will wait until a desktop moment.)

Kelly Stanford, Illustrator. Sometimes writing efforts, though good, are rejected! :(Previewing Wednesday?  We will look at the five canons in this slide set from my website section "Visual Learning"--> "Slides."

TASK: we need a groupMe!

Mea culpa comment: we will look at the hobbled two search engines in the navigate bar and note that AI is changing search engines at lightning pace. 

Posted on Monday, January 29, 2024 at 06:53AM by Registered CommenterMarybeth Shea | Comments Off

Welcome to Spring 2024: Week 1 (Wed, Fri)

Happy Wednesday

We will primarily use this platform as our class space.  I will post entries as a combination of what to read and what we spoke about in class.

By Monday, January 29, this should be the primary place for us to engage.  I will use ELMS for student email as well as the ELMS calendar to prompt you on assignments.

Ideas we will discuss this first week including:

  • critical thinking frames 
  • writing craft skills and choices
  • audience-centered writing
  • strategic redundancy
  • peer revision / drafting
  • labor grading 

Tools will we use include

  • GoogleMeet, compared to Zoom
  • Squarespace and this class journal
  • Eli Review (you will buy a subscription that is about 20 dollars; Not until week 2)
  • Padlet

More on Friday.  Most Fridays, I offer a little lesson on science visualization.   Enjoy this clip from Twitter->

Find her Science Pusheen series here. Hope this makes you happier. Did you find your field?  Or one of the classes you are now taking represented here?


 

Posted on Tuesday, January 23, 2024 at 02:03PM by Registered CommenterMarybeth Shea | Comments Off

Week 15: sliding into the break (after some finals bumps!)

Good morning.  Last day vibes, here.  One part wistful and most parts grateful for all y'all.

Three resources you have seen before that I will look at for the most common lapses in the final submission-->

  • Checklist (includes the celery-colored flow chart
  • Reading grid (consult YOURS that you work with (you HAVE ONE, right?)
  • That cognitive wedge (large baggy image from last week) that represents labor in thinking (both reading and writing)

Paragraphs that need work by many? These last paragraphs that we have been considered. Remember, there is no writing ever without rewriting. 

  • Closing paragraph
    • You do not need a symphonic chord closure or magician's ta dah. Try
      • Recommendation for further reads (curate link including to an abstract of research article is good)
      • Use of your ABT statement even if you already used this set of AND/BUT/THEREFORE ideas earlier.
      • Application, time to useful application, prediction, caution, policy note.
  • Stats/logos of number paragraph (pick one)
    • Use first person to show that this paragraph includes YOUR OBSERVATION, even if you also use the reflective prose of the researchers
    • Use Manchester U Phrasebank for help with this sort of science critical thinking within prose
  • General critical analysis of research paper (pick one)

Good news! CRISPR (Nature editorial, 11/23) approved for sickle cell therapy, in addition to a second FDA-approved option.  Looks like cure or near cure is in the wings. Huzzah! May all who need this lifesaving, life changing, pain-ameliorating therapy have real access (costs now approach 1M).  STEM is for human flourishing. 

TONIGHT: ER Review Task DUE for both Atlanta and Boulder Trains.

People ask me about extra credit options.  I have an idea and involves curated pictures (Google slides, natch) of what we talk about in class. Email me/needs to happen quickly.

Will hold digital office hours on Wednesday and Friday, 9-9:50 and 11-11:50.

May the rest of the month be low friction on the way down. And, stick the landing.  Cheering for you.

via GIPHY

 

Posted on Monday, December 11, 2023 at 06:45AM by Registered CommenterMarybeth Shea | CommentsPost a Comment

Week 14: one week left; critique; statistics/number logos critical thinking

Last week! Lions and tigers and bears, O my!

SKIM READING ONLY these complex topics linked (more on this in class).

Review/self-check: does your document look like a lemon? Does the reader slide off through your critique into a few, closely related conclusory ideas?

Does your document look more like a pear? Here, the reader moves through your critique into several caveats about conclusions, complexity about conclusions, policy context etc.

Hint: most people will rely on the lemon shape.

Now, onto the hardest analysis piece: evaluating the statistics used to vet the arguments made about data inference. Statistics overview in class this week.  I urge you to talk about statistics/logos critical thinking with your science and math professors.  To warm up, the ManU Phrasebank includes a "Describe quantities" section. Then, check out the "Reporting results" section, which will help your read your paper's use of statistics or number logos.

You will get better in the future about this critical thinking as you mature as a scientist: Promise! For example, in my field of ecology and environmental science, we are in a quiet riot over frequentist, mutivariate, and Bayesian statistics.  This was an assigned reading for me, in one of my classes. Here is another.

For biomedical researchers, you may appreciate this analysis of the limits of p-values in biomedial research.

Please look at your research articles for Wednesday, noting the type of statistics tool/logos of numbers  (web exhibit with short definitions) used.  Look these up in some way to have a working definition for yourself.  Common tools or tests from student papers over the last 15 years include:

  • p-values
  • confidence intervals
  • Student's t test (and corrections)
  • analysis of variance (ANOVA); one-tail, two-tail
  • power
  • sample size
  • type of study/limits -- observational study, case note, double-blind

I recommend using the link above to warm up your brain with a short working definition (remember this critical analysis tool from the rain garden memo?) and then go to Wikipedia or even a text book to read about your selected term(s) for more detail. 

The pre-reading activity will help you enter into the complexity.  Cognitive wedge is also your thinking friend.

I simply want you to know about this area within science articles, even if you do not understand now the statistics. You would not be alone among scientists, if you don't.  I don't, in many cases.  However, I want you to leave this class with an understanding of this important piece of critical thinking for your field. 

One key idea I can wax on about, though, is cautions about the (very limited) definition of significance testing and p-values.  For fun, enjoy this comic.

More generally, your critical analysis can comment on findings, your ideas or your close reading the author critique.  The ManU phrasebank is really helpful.  Here are a few selections that I copy/paste here for you. From the "Being critical" section, see these categories-->

Introducing problems and limitations: theory or argument
Introducing problems and limitations: method or practice
Using evaluative adjectives to comment on research
Introducing general criticism
Introducing the critical stance of particular writers

Practical note on dividing your critique: use separate paragraphs for specific discussion on stats/logos of numbers vetting from your more general critique.  For this class, you can pick one limiation to comment on, even though in real life, you would look at more than one weakness.  In someways, to focus on one represents a short presentation at a conference.  In a seminar setting, you would present more than one weakness.  Again, the ManU Phrasebank is so helpful. From "Discussing findings"-->

Advising cautious interpretation of the findings

Another source of uncertainty is …
A note of caution is due here since …
These findings may be somewhat limited by …
These findings cannot be extrapolated to all patients.
These data must be interpreted with caution because …
It could be argued that the positive results were due to …
These results therefore need to be interpreted with caution.
In observational studies, there is a potential for bias from …
It is important to bear in mind the possible bias in these responses.
Although exclusion of X did not …, these results should be interpreted with caution.
However, with a small sample size, caution must be applied, as the findings might not be …

 

It is possible that these results are due to …
are limited to …
do not represent …
have been confounded by …
were influenced by the lack of …
may underestimate the role of …
are biased, given the self-reported nature of …
may not be reproducible on a wide scale across …
Posted on Monday, December 4, 2023 at 06:41AM by Registered CommenterMarybeth Shea | CommentsPost a Comment

Week 13: post TG week-fest and on to wrapping up semester

Hello!

Damp and chilly. Have a warming beverage today in a glass, ceramic, pottery, double-wall metal thermos, or in a hard stable plastic cup.  Rain coat day, says Trixie. http://mbshea.squarespace.com/display/configuration/Basic?updated=true -  ENGL398V JOURNAL 

Pulling up from last week, let's look at a craft lesson and a critical thinking method-->

  • Colon v semi colon (sample-rich html piece) and even the power of the period to close a thought (terminal punctuation)
  • Fun way to think on the counting out power of three, four, and perhaps even seven. Why did I spell those one-decimal place numbers out as prose?
    • From your grid
  • Recall the “power of three, four, or seven” of George Miller (1956) BUT also look at this 2012 Science Daily summary of “four is magical” ; bottom line?

    Three or four, plus perhaps subclusters of related ideas for a total of seven is a good strategy for audience cognition and memory.

     

Visual reminders about colon and semi-colon: In class, I will use two stacked, closed fists for the colon and two stacked fists, one open and one closed to help you remember.  Here is one image to work with, clipped and linked from this teaching exhibit

    Third Grade Science Activities: Superhero Strength

Side note: Requesting help from two or more students to make these images for us.  Details in class.  Sure wish we had an animator, too, to capture the power of the punch that the colon embodies.  You have seen an aspect of the semi colon hand symbol I will show that this is the bunny paws memonic about punctuation to set off apositives. Remember that? Here is a visual reminders-->

http://mbshea.squarespace.com/display/configuration/Basic?updated=true -  ENGL398V JOURNAL - Friday, peer review of rain garden memo

Synthesis of the bunny paws, signal phrases/citation alerts, and a handout you have seen embellisment (where you add information in front of the subject-verb pair, at the end of the subject verb pair OR you break the subject-verb pair).

Introducing a key phrase or signal phrase for referral links is a way to cite:  
According to Rachel Ray.....  (sentence beginning)
Other sentence positions? 
Cupcake ipsum dolor sit amet -- according to Rachel Ray --  gummi bears donut liquorice. Pie sugar plum fruitcake donut marshmallow halvah lollipop cheesecake. Pastry danish chocolate cupcake pie muffin carrot cake oat cake.
Cupcake ipsum dolor sit amet gummi bears donut liquorice. Pie sugar plum fruitcake donut marshmallow halvah lollipop cheesecake, according to Rachel Ray. Pastry danish chocolate cupcake pie muffin carrot cake oat cake.
Other signal phrases to anchor what you write into sound sources (without doing APA )that you link with curation-->
You can find this rain garden construction information here in a short web exhibit hosted by the University of Maryland rain garden guide.
In a 2008 study, Davis found that. . .
More than fifty studies by Davis and others affirm. . .
This design guide includes. . .

According to Rachel Ray.....  (sentence beginning/according to is a powerful phrase to set up ethos or trustworthiness. 

Back to assignment 3: You will use according to and other signal phrases to make clear the work of your authors.

Pigeon and colleagues found that...

According to other neuralgia specialists, Pain's findings in this study offer...

One application of Perez's method is...

Clinicians can apply these bio-social aspects of pain management immediately, according to the authors in their discussion section.

Combining signal phrases with YOUR VOICE to show YOUR THOUGHTS/CRITIQUE/ANALYSIS-->

I remain confused by Pigeon's insistence on using Cochrane review techniques only.

In addition to admiring Pain's study design, I appreciate her clear discussion for patients so they can understand how physicians approach pain scales.

We can learn a great deal about study design by focusing on the methods section in our reading; Perez and colleagues designed an elegant soil profile sampling apparatus. Further, they give detailed instructions for how to build this device from PVC pipe, available at hardware stores.

Preview of Wednesday:  The Manchester University Academic Phrasebank.  

Introducing work

There are many ways to introduce an academic essay or short ...

Being critical

As an academic writer, you are expected to be critical of the ...

Writing Conclusions

Conclusions are shorter sections of academic texts which usually ...

Connecting conclusions at Man U with our work --->

 

  • Use the seven openings to build an ending
  • Suggest additional reading that you and your reader might want to examine next
  • Describe a clinical application and possible time line
  • Comment on policy difficulties in using or disseminating the technology
  • Critique a danger or downside of findings

 

Walk out music to help us remember (sound plus video) about COUNTING OUT.

Posted on Monday, November 27, 2023 at 06:15AM by Registered CommenterMarybeth Shea | CommentsPost a Comment