_____________________________________
Being a chemist. Oops, science is POWERFUL!

ENGL 390, 390H, and (sometimes) 398V  Class Journal

_____________________________________

Reading and writing your one-article review

Here is a googe doc for you to copy/download to track your reading.  Let's talk a bit about more elements of this pattern of paragraphs (PoP).  I am reposting the openings link from below, about the seven strategies.

Opening and closing a document (related strategies!)

Articles have beginnings, middles, and ends. Think Lemon-shaped (variation is pear). Interestingly, beginnings and ends have similarlties. We have a number of options; look at these seven strategies for opening. Some rough thoughts about formality and audience type:

News article openings are good for the lay audience.  Why?  Several strategies:

  • highly visual
  • interesting case
  • hook with tidbit of interesting information
  • topic (timely)

For technical audiences, open with

  • review of logos (detail of costs, population size, enormity of problem)
  • controversy
  • new application or breaking news

Let's look at this recent article in PloS One about writing scientific prose. In Science, two scientists talk about how they read articles. Ruben writes with a somewhat lighthearted approach while Pain responds to his piece with her approach. Read the comments.

We will talk about what type of article you have:  research article, literature review, meta-analysis, proof, proof-of-concept, specialized application, method, opinion or memoir.

Here is the "bible" of writing (and reading) scientific prose:  Mayfield. Now, let's look/review at the basic parts of the IMRAD article using this guide.

As promised, a flow-diagram to help you.



 

 

Posted on Monday, March 2, 2020 at 07:31AM by Registered CommenterMarybeth Shea | CommentsPost a Comment

Toward the review article

Documents have beginnings, middles, and ends.Here is a good way to arrange your description+analysis:
Beginning: 1-3 paragraphs that prepare the reader to understand and trust the center portion of your analysis (three or four body paragraphs).  Use a cognitive wedge strategy. Think:
Opening (see the seven strategies below -- you can combine them.)
Ethos of lead author
Definitions/descriptions or backgrounds, which is largely common knowledge to your expert audience.
Middle: 3-4 body paragraphs. Start with one paragraph per point BUT you may need to divide complex material into two shorter but connected (by transition) paragraph. These are your larger paragraphs.  You MAY need to nest small definitions -- use the appositive technique -- near the material.
End: Taper off, with some useful information or thoughts for closing.  For example, brief critique  and some commentary on stats used to support the inferences from hypothesis testing (this is hard and will NOT count against your work grade-wise), applications, further line of inquiry, implications for society.
New links for class discussion today:
Academic language phrase bank (really useful for analysis and writing). Spend some time here AND save the link.   Thank you to the fine folks at Manchester University, UK.
Opening moves for technical documents: (seven ways! With examples, a web exhibit on a legacy platform)
Some additional details: Citation/ethos/introduce your lead researcher:  in class, we will talk about the conventions of citation in a close read of an article.  Basically, the steps are:
first mention, full name (in the ethos paragraph that also introduces the article).
(author, date)
last name throughout
Example:  
Marybeth Shea is a professor of technical writing at the University of Maryland. Shea studies stasis theory in environmental policymaking.  Her research article appears in the Journal of Conservation Biology and is the subject of this review (Shea, 2014). Then, in rest of document, refer to the work using the last name:
Shea's approach...
Her findings...
What Shea's inference fails to account for...

 

Posted on Friday, February 28, 2020 at 07:36AM by Registered CommenterMarybeth Shea | CommentsPost a Comment

Paragraphs

reading strategies and the difference between analysis and description.  These items will prepare you for the next writing assignment. You will need a research article from your field TBD in class, further.  

Paragraph guidance

Here are MS Word two handouts that we use to think about paragraph elements.

Paragraph Definition: think Architectures

Paragraph Types (samples from the field, clipped, complete with some errors. Be careful about what you post on the web.)

 

One of Aristotle's canons for writing is ARRANGEMENT.  The order and "chunking" of information matters very much for reader cognition and receptivity to what you write. 

Now: reading strategy resources:

Be aware of the difference between description work in writing and analysis work in writing (practice this in your reading, in all your classes).

Description/Analysis examples (in Google doc, with links. Please read links, too) 

My one-page adaptation (Google doc) of KE's reading strategies guide.

Check out Raul Pachego Vega’s excellent blog/website, with this set of resources for undergraduate students 

Posted on Wednesday, February 26, 2020 at 07:38AM by Registered CommenterMarybeth Shea | CommentsPost a Comment

Class cancelled TODAY; papers due in

class on Wednesday. We can print in the classrom.

Family emergency. 

 

Posted on Monday, February 24, 2020 at 07:05AM by Registered CommenterMarybeth Shea | CommentsPost a Comment

Friday's session; Sunday OHitS; DUE MONDAY

in hard copy, double-spaced.  You can print in class.

Link to Office Hours in the Sky google doc. Checklist is in the document, too.

 

Happy Friday: Let's have a parody video.

Posted on Friday, February 21, 2020 at 08:01AM by Registered CommenterMarybeth Shea | CommentsPost a Comment