_____________________________________
Being a chemist. Oops, science is POWERFUL!

ENGL 390, 390H, and (sometimes) 398V  Class Journal

_____________________________________

Week 3: stasis theory (five categories), complexity, and rain garden memo

Monday, again!

Here is a complex preview of Assignment 1: short definitional memo.  Lots here but read as an overview.  We will drill down into details all week.

Stasis 1: Conjecture What is a rain garden? 

The structure and type of paragraphs you will write follow Aristotle's stasis theory in this short slide presentation (very much a system of analysis and action, like your scientific method steps):

  • Stasis 2: Definition (what is a rain garden, briefly, by two functions)
    • Stasis 2aClassification (what type of technology is this? Hint: low impact development and storm water management)
    • Stasis 2bDescription (Illustrative; give detail on the layers of soil and the type of plants)
        • include two examples; consider the ones on campus
        • Where is stasis 3?  TBD: hint -- practical causality
    • Where is Stasis 3 concerning causality? Is dispersed within form and function that is a cogntive frame that binds all of the memo together. TBD. Preview--how does the rain garden work?
  • Stasis 4: Evaluation (is this good or bad?  Use Dr. Davis' research as you do not have authority to evaluate based on your expertise)

I would think you need about one source per these paras: classifying, illustrating, evaluating.  We will discuss but: 

  1. The first paragraphs will use thoughtfully curated links as hypertext citations sometimes called user-active annotations.; yet
  2. The last paragraph -- Evaluation paragraph that makes a claim using expertise as evidence with use (author, date) citation from APA guidelines. Include a works cited section in this memo, also.

 

Now, a COGNITIVE FRAME for this memo-->

Audience scenario for this memo: Here is Jane, our boss. She asked for the memo at the end of our last staff meeting (we are pretending, here). Hint: use your rhetorical triangle of Audience/Context/Purpose

irst up! What is a memo?  

 

A memo is a genre or document type that readers+writers use for cognitive efficiencyBy the way, the OWL website at Purdue is a fabulous resource for writing. Memos also have a standard format:  See the image to the left.  Also, look at the email heading in your software.  This electronic message is based on the memo format.  

Bonus question:  what is the difference, traditionally, between a memo and a letter?

Now, WRITING CRAFT mini lesson-->

Topic Sentences: A list of qualities for you to strive for

  • Usually a short direct sentence (think announcement)
  • Signals the topic in the paragraph (think preview)
  • Hooks the reader by 1) raising a question or 2) provoking thought
  • Can be placed anywhere, but early on in the paragraph is the best default strategy for most professional documents; in other words, at the beginning of the paragraph
  • Contains an element of transition from the previous paragraph

Note:  topic sentences can be implied in tightly coherent prose (for now, leave this subtle technique to the professionals!)

Content area: read online for about fifteen minutes about rain gardens, bioretention, low impact development.  Note how different Google is now for searching. TBD more on Wednesday.

Visual about stasis theory from slide set linked above o linger on-->

Hierarchy of directional stasis theory steps

Linked under this clip is the Purdue OWL web exhibit on stasis theory.  Worth a look at the trusted (high ethos) source that is a true community service to all writers and especially students.

Posted on Monday, February 5, 2024 at 07:58AM by Registered CommenterMarybeth Shea | Comments Off

Week 2: class culture and some previews

Happy Monday!  The Chiefs and the '9ers headed to the Superb Owls event.  Puppy Bowl never disappoints.

Today, we will look at these resources, so that you are more confident about where we are going-->UPDATED LINKS 10:45 AM

  • These two slide sets
  • A visit to Eli Review (you DID watch the short video, right?) where I will show you selected pages from last semester.  My goal here is to show you that in the Eli Review Writing Prompt, I gather and link the teaching resources you will need to complete that assignment.  Strategic redundancy is an audience-friendly writing technique that you can imitate.
  • What is a mentor text and why should you care?
    • Think example. Students always request writing examples, especially exemplars.
    • Look at the whole via the frame of audience-centered work. Then,
    • Look at the writing craft choices that make this test work.  Note them and imitate selected ones for your work.
      • DO NOT COPY THE MENTOR TEXT WHOLE CLOTH.
  • How many assignments this semester?  Three assignments each with several required draft/peer revision iterations.  Within these three assignment processes, we will learn
    • cognitive and critical thinking frames, as well as
      • meta discourse
      • counting out
      • strategic redundancy
      • definition work before major content and within major content
      • curated hypertext links
      • cognitive wedge
    • writing craft choices like
      • voice
      • paragraph sizing
      • transitions between paragraphs
      • topic sentence strategies
      • colon v. semi colon
      • AND MORE, including how to cite properly for each context.  Hint: referral links are a type of semi-formation citation.  I use links in this teaching platform, for your convenience to GIVE CREDIT.  Pusheen is an example. 

Knitting up from last week.  Here is my favorite Science Pusheen just now. (Is a large image and you cick to see entirely WHEN you wish. FIXED on Friday,!Most on their phones will wait until a desktop moment.)

Kelly Stanford, Illustrator. Sometimes writing efforts, though good, are rejected! :(Previewing Wednesday?  We will look at the five canons in this slide set from my website section "Visual Learning"--> "Slides."

TASK: we need a groupMe!

Mea culpa comment: we will look at the hobbled two search engines in the navigate bar and note that AI is changing search engines at lightning pace. 

Posted on Monday, January 29, 2024 at 06:53AM by Registered CommenterMarybeth Shea | Comments Off

Welcome to Spring 2024: Week 1 (Wed, Fri)

Happy Wednesday

We will primarily use this platform as our class space.  I will post entries as a combination of what to read and what we spoke about in class.

By Monday, January 29, this should be the primary place for us to engage.  I will use ELMS for student email as well as the ELMS calendar to prompt you on assignments.

Ideas we will discuss this first week including:

  • critical thinking frames 
  • writing craft skills and choices
  • audience-centered writing
  • strategic redundancy
  • peer revision / drafting
  • labor grading 

Tools will we use include

  • GoogleMeet, compared to Zoom
  • Squarespace and this class journal
  • Eli Review (you will buy a subscription that is about 20 dollars; Not until week 2)
  • Padlet

More on Friday.  Most Fridays, I offer a little lesson on science visualization.   Enjoy this clip from Twitter->

Find her Science Pusheen series here. Hope this makes you happier. Did you find your field?  Or one of the classes you are now taking represented here?


 

Posted on Tuesday, January 23, 2024 at 02:03PM by Registered CommenterMarybeth Shea | Comments Off

Week 15: sliding into the break (after some finals bumps!)

Good morning.  Last day vibes, here.  One part wistful and most parts grateful for all y'all.

Three resources you have seen before that I will look at for the most common lapses in the final submission-->

  • Checklist (includes the celery-colored flow chart
  • Reading grid (consult YOURS that you work with (you HAVE ONE, right?)
  • That cognitive wedge (large baggy image from last week) that represents labor in thinking (both reading and writing)

Paragraphs that need work by many? These last paragraphs that we have been considered. Remember, there is no writing ever without rewriting. 

  • Closing paragraph
    • You do not need a symphonic chord closure or magician's ta dah. Try
      • Recommendation for further reads (curate link including to an abstract of research article is good)
      • Use of your ABT statement even if you already used this set of AND/BUT/THEREFORE ideas earlier.
      • Application, time to useful application, prediction, caution, policy note.
  • Stats/logos of number paragraph (pick one)
    • Use first person to show that this paragraph includes YOUR OBSERVATION, even if you also use the reflective prose of the researchers
    • Use Manchester U Phrasebank for help with this sort of science critical thinking within prose
  • General critical analysis of research paper (pick one)

Good news! CRISPR (Nature editorial, 11/23) approved for sickle cell therapy, in addition to a second FDA-approved option.  Looks like cure or near cure is in the wings. Huzzah! May all who need this lifesaving, life changing, pain-ameliorating therapy have real access (costs now approach 1M).  STEM is for human flourishing. 

TONIGHT: ER Review Task DUE for both Atlanta and Boulder Trains.

People ask me about extra credit options.  I have an idea and involves curated pictures (Google slides, natch) of what we talk about in class. Email me/needs to happen quickly.

Will hold digital office hours on Wednesday and Friday, 9-9:50 and 11-11:50.

May the rest of the month be low friction on the way down. And, stick the landing.  Cheering for you.

via GIPHY

 

Posted on Monday, December 11, 2023 at 06:45AM by Registered CommenterMarybeth Shea | CommentsPost a Comment

Week 14: one week left; critique; statistics/number logos critical thinking

Last week! Lions and tigers and bears, O my!

SKIM READING ONLY these complex topics linked (more on this in class).

Review/self-check: does your document look like a lemon? Does the reader slide off through your critique into a few, closely related conclusory ideas?

Does your document look more like a pear? Here, the reader moves through your critique into several caveats about conclusions, complexity about conclusions, policy context etc.

Hint: most people will rely on the lemon shape.

Now, onto the hardest analysis piece: evaluating the statistics used to vet the arguments made about data inference. Statistics overview in class this week.  I urge you to talk about statistics/logos critical thinking with your science and math professors.  To warm up, the ManU Phrasebank includes a "Describe quantities" section. Then, check out the "Reporting results" section, which will help your read your paper's use of statistics or number logos.

You will get better in the future about this critical thinking as you mature as a scientist: Promise! For example, in my field of ecology and environmental science, we are in a quiet riot over frequentist, mutivariate, and Bayesian statistics.  This was an assigned reading for me, in one of my classes. Here is another.

For biomedical researchers, you may appreciate this analysis of the limits of p-values in biomedial research.

Please look at your research articles for Wednesday, noting the type of statistics tool/logos of numbers  (web exhibit with short definitions) used.  Look these up in some way to have a working definition for yourself.  Common tools or tests from student papers over the last 15 years include:

  • p-values
  • confidence intervals
  • Student's t test (and corrections)
  • analysis of variance (ANOVA); one-tail, two-tail
  • power
  • sample size
  • type of study/limits -- observational study, case note, double-blind

I recommend using the link above to warm up your brain with a short working definition (remember this critical analysis tool from the rain garden memo?) and then go to Wikipedia or even a text book to read about your selected term(s) for more detail. 

The pre-reading activity will help you enter into the complexity.  Cognitive wedge is also your thinking friend.

I simply want you to know about this area within science articles, even if you do not understand now the statistics. You would not be alone among scientists, if you don't.  I don't, in many cases.  However, I want you to leave this class with an understanding of this important piece of critical thinking for your field. 

One key idea I can wax on about, though, is cautions about the (very limited) definition of significance testing and p-values.  For fun, enjoy this comic.

More generally, your critical analysis can comment on findings, your ideas or your close reading the author critique.  The ManU phrasebank is really helpful.  Here are a few selections that I copy/paste here for you. From the "Being critical" section, see these categories-->

Introducing problems and limitations: theory or argument
Introducing problems and limitations: method or practice
Using evaluative adjectives to comment on research
Introducing general criticism
Introducing the critical stance of particular writers

Practical note on dividing your critique: use separate paragraphs for specific discussion on stats/logos of numbers vetting from your more general critique.  For this class, you can pick one limiation to comment on, even though in real life, you would look at more than one weakness.  In someways, to focus on one represents a short presentation at a conference.  In a seminar setting, you would present more than one weakness.  Again, the ManU Phrasebank is so helpful. From "Discussing findings"-->

Advising cautious interpretation of the findings

Another source of uncertainty is …
A note of caution is due here since …
These findings may be somewhat limited by …
These findings cannot be extrapolated to all patients.
These data must be interpreted with caution because …
It could be argued that the positive results were due to …
These results therefore need to be interpreted with caution.
In observational studies, there is a potential for bias from …
It is important to bear in mind the possible bias in these responses.
Although exclusion of X did not …, these results should be interpreted with caution.
However, with a small sample size, caution must be applied, as the findings might not be …

 

It is possible that these results are due to …
are limited to …
do not represent …
have been confounded by …
were influenced by the lack of …
may underestimate the role of …
are biased, given the self-reported nature of …
may not be reproducible on a wide scale across …
Posted on Monday, December 4, 2023 at 06:41AM by Registered CommenterMarybeth Shea | CommentsPost a Comment