« Peer review on rain garden memo/DUE FRIDAY | Main | Friday, working toward writing a short memo »

Monday is a rain garden day!

How are your memos going?  Let's talk about the Oxford or serial or Harvard comma, based on your "reading" of the video text assigned to you on Friday.  BTW, I found a fun and polite version here:

Oxford comma (wars): Look at these examples, to jump start the lesson.

To my parents, Ayn Rand and God.

To my parents, J.K. Rowling and God.

To my parents, Stephen Colbert and Jon Stewart.

OR

In a newspaper account of a documentary about Merle Haggard:

Among those interviewed were his two ex-wives, Kris Kristofferson and Robert Duvall.

These two preceding examples are from Theresa HaydenHere is another doosie that cries out for a serial or Oxford comma.

 Here is another doosie that cries out for a serial or Oxford comma.

The Times once published an unintentionally humorous description of a Peter Ustinov documentary, noting that "highlights of his global tour include encounters with Nelson Mandela, an 800-year-old demigod and a dildo collector."

Now, to be clear, the serial comma does not always solve ambiguity problems:

They went to Oregon with Betty, a maid and a cook –

  • They went to Oregon with Betty, who was a maid and a cook. (One person)
  • They went to Oregon with Betty, both a maid and a cook. (One person)
  • They went to Oregon with Betty, a maid and cook. (One person)
  • They went to Oregon with Betty (a maid) and a cook. (Two people)
  • They went to Oregon with Betty, a maid, and with a cook. (Two people)
  • They went to Oregon with Betty – a maid – and a cook. (Two people)
  • They went to Oregon with the maid Betty and a cook. (Two people)
  • They went to Oregon with a cook and Betty, a maid. (Two people)
  • They went to Oregon with Betty as well as a maid and a cook. (Three people)
  • They went to Oregon with Betty and a maid and a cook. (Three people)
  • They went to Oregon with Betty, one maid and a cook. (Three people)
  • They went to Oregon with a maid, a cook, and Betty. (Three people)


We can also look at the grocery list problem: 

buying  bread, jam, coffee, cream, juice, eggs and bacon. VS

eating toast and jam,

ordering coffee and cream, juice, and bacon and eggs

Science and the Oxford comma: Consider these examples from Sarah Lichter.  Here is one from my writing practice recently:

Conservation biologists look at two approaches to biodiversity losses, species counts in the tropics and changing distribution maps.

What about this one that the protodoctors among us might say to a patient:

Your cancer can be treated with chemotherapy, surgery or immunotherapy.

HINT: Jane really likes short direct topic sentences that rely on subject-verb preview of what is in the paragraph.  Why?  She skims most memos.  This pattern supports a busy reader, while making you look like a clear and considerate writing.
For Wednesday, we will start looking at paragraphs. Paragrahh transitions: like pearls on a string. Here is an exhibit on paragraph transitions, in this Google doc.  The beauty of these two documents is that they were written by friends of mine.  I simply marked their use of strong transitions.

 

But first,  we will think aboout empty subjects.  Strong sentencing relies in part on thinking about subjects and avoiding ambiguity with pronouns. Wednesday is also peer review in class, with Friday the due date for your hard copy memo.  Would you like a checklist for both Wednesday and Friday?  Here you are.

 

Posted on Monday, February 9, 2015 at 08:06AM by Registered CommenterMarybeth Shea | CommentsPost a Comment

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>