Week 10: Election pause on Monday; resume
an asynchronous session on UPDATED FRIDAY in SAME OHitS/AMA document (open through Saturday about 5PM for your questions, by request.) There, I will start with three categories of Q&A:
- Check on your research article suitability. DO NOT use a literature review. The scope here is way to too large for this assignment.
- Look at endings, cognitive wedge AND how thinking about endings can help you with a closure. In this way, you are thinking about
- Paragraph 1
- Paragraph N, where N is the number of paragraphs you write. Most students write between 10 and 14 paragraphs. Page counts are really not helpful here.
- Think about the ethos of your first-author researcher. You will need to write a paragraph early on that establishes the discipline, workplace, and special lines of inquiry within the field.
WEDNESDAY NEW UPDATE 9:35 AM: an MP4 about the next and final one-article close review assignment.) Have you started reading in the ways suggested below?
Next up? Read your article and prepare to write a formal review of this science research piece. If you like to start now:
Reading science and scientific literature, some articles for you to skim, parse, or review (KE's guide):
- Guidance for health professionals and physicians in 2009 "Critical Appraisal of Scientific Literature" -- all will appreciate the clarity, conciseness, and document design of the abstract. This table is particularly useful also. Note: you can seek out two other related articles, as this is the first of three.
- This open access guide to writing a literature review can help you read a literature review.
- In 2016, AAAS (do you know what that is?) published a series on reading scientific literature. In this piece, be sure to look at the summaries of how different scientists approach their reading.
A.I., a student who recently took the DAT, suggests that you consider learning about the Search and Destroy close reading method. Additional note from A.I., she thinks that the ABT -- and, but, therefore -- structure could help you prep for job or grad/prof school interviews. I agree!
Do you have an election watch plan? I will use GoogleMeet and text messages to connect with my young adult children and a few friends. We are dividing the news coverage to look at CNN, PBS, and CSPAN, as well as BBC. I read this guide about election stress last week, from a therapist at Psychology Today. I also plan to gear up and bike on Tuesday, perhaps three short rides, first, for fresh air and second, as a good way to discharge stress: exercise.
Take care, dear students. Meet you Wednesday asynchronously (your vote) for a check in on our last assignment: review of your research article. I will prepare a screencast to describe the assignment.
LESSON for Friday to support you this weekend in thinking and drafting parts of your one-article review:1) first, making a good start. Think of this as a strong move at the beginning. Also, keep in mind the cognitive wedge strategy. 2) Citation and ethos early on. The ONLY CITATION YOU NEED IS THE ARTICLE YOU ARE WORKING WITH. We will take up a variation later.
Opening moves for technical documents
Citation: conventions of citation in a close read of an article. Basically, the steps are:
- first mention, full name (in the ethos paragraph that also introduces the article).
- (author, date)
- last name throughout
- Example:
- Marybeth Shea is a professor of technical writing at the University of Maryland. She studies stasis theory in environmental policymaking. Her research article appears in the Journal of Conservation Biology and is the subject of this review (Shea, 2014).
- Alan Miller directs climate change research at the World Bank Group. Miller, an attorney, also teaches at the Vermont Law School. This recent study was published in Environmental Policy, a journal concerning science-driven policy options (Miller, 2016).
Reader Comments