« Week 13: definitions support, phrases/word from ManU phrasebank | Main | Week 11: what shape will your review document take? »

Week 12: (picking up from previous links; reading/thinking)

Morning,

All the linked material in the first part of this post you have seen before (hope you have been reading all along). I want to revisit them to highlight items.

  • Opening (see the seven strategies (Google doc based on RICE University's CAIN project)
    • We will look at the last part of the document and see a link to Manchester University's Academic phrasebank
  • How to read science! Reposting entire paragraph so we can peek into this process-->
    • Let's look at this recent article in PloS One about writing scientific prose. In Science, two scientists talk about how they read articles. Ruben writes with a somewhat lighthearted approach while Pain responds to his piece with her approach. Read the comments. Peek into the strategies of technical readers.
  • First author conventions: reposting the paragraph-->
    1. If you cannot find a first author author bio, focus on the last author. Let's review the conventions on order in authors. Here is a thoughtful NCBI/NIH article on first author conventions. Two additional resources are this 2010 open access piece at Science and this 2012 Nature short guidance article.
    2. I will add some thoughts on when you cannot find an author (science is international; different conventions on maintaining lab pages, university or institutional profiles, and even cultural differences/language)
  • Three is a magic number! Reposting (and is in your reading grid) --> Recall the “power of three, four, or seven” of George Miller (1956) BUT also look at this 2012 Science Daily summary of “four is magical” ; bottom line? Three or four, plus perhaps subclusters of related ideas for a total of seven is a good strategy for audience cognition and memory.

 

New stuff! Remember stasis theory?  Let's look at stasis 2, description/definition; stasis 3 concerns causal analysis (the heart of science). This short guide (Google doc, two pages with good links) focuses on how to recognize stasis 2 and stasis 3 in what you read, as well as prep to write these stases in YOUR documents.

I do not think we looked fully at Burke's Pentad (slides, starting with 12)about understanding audience, context, purpose. We will review on Wed, also.  Why?  We need to think about context and readers as agents who act upon information in documents. 

 

Posted on Monday, April 14, 2025 at 05:27AM by Registered CommenterMarybeth Shea | Comments Off