« Week 8: coffee cup nearly done; one article close review up next | Main | Week 6: Coffee cup memo relies on description v. analysis framing »

Week 7: coffee cup work AND selected technical article for Assignment 3

Good morning, fine Terp-Sci Wri students.

DUE TONIGHT!  Monday's ER REVIEWING TASK.  Help each other out by being on time for each other.  Friday's ER WRITING TASK is draft 3 of the memo.  Next week? Parking lot opens for my grading of the memo.  Then, we move on to the last assignment: One-article close review.  Preview by flow chart linked here, in our celery green color now familar to you.

Let's have a lesson on writing craft that is a sub-category: document design. Document design covers a range of sub-sub topics but here, our focus is on formatting the words upon the page into "chunks" that are governed by styles guides, including MLA and APA. Here is block quote (PARA 5, the LCA paragraph) from my dissertation-->

In Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants, ecologist Robin Wall Kimmerer notes:

Even a wounded world is feeding us. Even a wounded world holds us, giving us moments of wonder and joy. I choose joy over despair. Not because I have my head in the sand, but because joy is what the earth gives me daily and I must return the gift.  Kimmerer (2015)

-------

At the end of the document, here is what is my very last citation in my 300+ bibliography-->

Kimmerer, R. W. (2015). Braiding sweetgrass. Milkweed Editions.

Note, this is too short for a hanging indent. Always be learning. Here is what one looks like for a longer paper by RWK. Recall that the hanging indent in a long bibliography helps a reader find a desired citation because the last name sits out in a "panhandle."  (I did a screen shot of this reference below, using large font to focus on the "shape" of the hanging indent.)

Now, here is a visual metaphor to remember the look of a hanging indent. 

(Think: Oklahoma!).

How to do these indents? In Scribbr, this short article will help you in both MS Word and in Google Docs.

Shall we focus on some additional details within the coffee cup memo?

  1. Common knowledge is still a topic of uncertainty for many of you. Hint: common knowledge determination is hard and varies by audience/context/purpose. This Scribbr short article will help you. 
    1. PARA 4: At the level of detail in this writing scenario (short recommendation report in memo for work), you do
      1. NOT have to use formal references for the mention of climate change problem scope (IPCC is your most authoritative reference, not paywalled, and is perfect for the referral link, CURATED, naturally.) OR the mention of the ocean/aquatic plastic problem emerging documentation (Algalita Foundation or Charles Moore Research Institute are authoritative, not paywalled, and are perfect for the referral link.).
      2. NEED to reference formally the Moore peer reviewed article or the Hocking peer reviewed article in your evaluation paragraph. 
    2. Please note, that referral links give you the opportunity to "cover your behind" (CYA) about plagiarism concerns.  So, you should be psychologically comforted by this informal reference technique.
  2. Acknowledging the other frame/green cup in the recommendation at the end of the memo.  You can do this in a number of ways, beginning with the sample sentences I have given you.  Another way to manage this is to use referral links to unpaywalled sources about the other problem and the research.  For example, you could
    1. TEAM STYRO: Send the reader to a Moore open access link.  Build Moore's reputation by a brief sentence about their ethos.  OR
    2. TEAM PAPER: Send the reader to a Hocking open access link (harder). Build Hocking's reputation by a brief sentence about their ethos.
    3. OPTION:  you could remind about incommensurality, defined in Week 6.
    4. OPTION: you could note that social behavior is at the heart of this problem because people pretty much know that a re-usuable option (after using many times to outweigh the energy and pollution associated with glass, ceramic, and metal production).
  3. Confusion about where definition stops and analysis begins: Roughly, PARA 5, the LCA paragraph is the pivot point from description that is necessary to set up the problem resolution.

 Now, topical reflection on how logos, pathos, and ethos overlap in a real example (20 second YourTube clis)-->

Posted on Monday, October 14, 2024 at 06:22AM by Registered CommenterMarybeth Shea | Comments Off