Week 6: Coffee cup memo relies on description v. analysis framing
Happy Monday. Tonight, your ER REVIEWING TASK is due. You WILL gain knowledge as you help each other. As in the case of the rain garden memo, you will see two things:
- level of detail (just right! Not too much, not too little, aka the Goldilocks sweet spot)
- where to place details(which paragraph showcases the detail best?)
And for you? You can draft off each other in a cycling or aerodynamic way. In this short 2017 web article from Cycling Tips is this quote:
So how much energy can you save from drafting? Interestingly, there seems to be little consensus among researchers that have investigated this topic. Studies have shown drag reductions of between 27% and 50% for riders that are drafting, with the exact reduction depending on a number of variables — the size and on-the-bike position of the rider in front, likewise with the rider drafting, the distance from the wheel in front, the direction and strength of the wind, and more.
(de Vroet, Matthew)
This, just above, shows how to do a block quote (option for you re your life cycle assessment (LCA) paragraph. Paraphrase is fine. USE THE FOUNDER definition from EPA. Please.
We are still working off WEEK 5's guidance below, especially the flow chart (pale yellow-green large image). I have resources on framing/thinking:
- Focus on difference between description and analysis (key critical thinking skill) in this linked google doc (skim the embedded links, please)
- Metadiscourse (counting out is a metadiscourse strategy) and voice propel the complexity forward with flow (science examples in this short google doc)
- Note that description, combined with analysis, supports recommendations
- look at the last sentence of each paragraph;
- then look at the first sentence in the next paragraph.
Do you see connection between content, including a reasonable pivot to new information? The paragraphs, although they stand alone in topic and content, should CONNECT or TRANSITION with the surrounding paragraphs.
Paragraph check: Ask
- What is the paragraph doing in the document? What type of paragraph serves this purpose? For example, a narrative paragraph can tell a brief story or present a case or example. An illustrative paragraph – cousin to descriptive paragraphs - paints a picture.
- Is the paragraph cohesive? Does the content “hang” together? Do the sentence choices achieve cohesion? Look at the transition words and phrases in the OWL link above. You can use them to achieve cohesion and flow between sentences. This focus is called local coherence, which is key to achieving flow.
Finally, paragraphs do not truly stand alone in most documents. Paragraphs combine to provide coherent content in a document for a reader. Ask this: do the paragraphs fit and support the arrangement or structure of the document? Focus on transitions between paragraphs, which help with cohesion in the document. Local coherence (within a paragraph) + global coherence (between paragraphs and within a document) create overall flow.
Cheap! Way To achieve cohesion between paragraphs try "chaining" by transitions. Place the topic of the next paragraph in the last sentence of the preceding paragraph. The first sentence of the new paragraph must include that topic also. Doing this knits or binds the paragraphs to each other. Here is how a math person would say this:
Let ParaA be the preceding paragraph.
Let ParaB be the following paragraph.
Let T be the topic that should appear in both paragraphs.
- the last sentence of ParaA and the
- first sentence of ParaB.
In reality, ParaA and ParaB exist in a document with an arrangement of many paragraphs.
ParaA relates to ParaB through the last sentence of ParaA AND SIMULTANEOUSLY through the first sentence of ParaB. The relating elements is a topic, T; T can be a repeated word or a phrase. Some variation on T makes for good style.
Tight transitions pivot on repetition of key word or short phrase. Loose transitions allow a topic substitution or phrase (selected with care for reader knowledge/background).
Food for thought: You also can use the transition space to punt or jump to another subtopic in the memo. Phrases:
Having reminded you of the central emergency of climate change, let's turn now to...
Now that you have more details on the emerging problem of ocean plastic, we can look at...
Recall that this memo is a short back-of-the-envelope analysis for our purposes. We can reconsider these frames more carefully but would face the incommensurability problem.
Wednesday preview:
- will talk about informal (IPPCC and Algalita Foundation) and formal sources (Hocking and Moore)
- "punting" with curated linked referral citations
- cautions about the ethos of who shares information from peer reviewed research
- discussion (critical thinking) on the incommensurability of direct comparison of climate change problem with ocean plastic problem and how to note and then punt (this link really needs curation: TBD in class)
Helpful short video to think about the complexity here of the linked problems of pollution (CO2, single use plastic) and depletion (stress upon a resource: climate system and ocean/water system. Think cycles: carbon and water). From UMD genius Herman Daly.
Short follow-up on Monday's mega-post: punting by referral link. This is especially useful when noting the seriousness of your environmental problem. What is a punt (football) or even a bunt (baseball)? The metaphor in writing means we can point readers to a source to consider complexity outside of the through-line of the document. In other words, we are not going to explain everything about
- climate change (refer them to an open access Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) source -- caution! Huge PDFs) OR
- ocean plastic (refer them to Algalita Foundation (open access and html pages)
This type of referral link reminds me of the books designed in a choose-your-own-adventure. You give audiences a helpful path to go down but do not require all readers to do this. Look at how audience-friendly hypertext is for you to refer readers!
Refinement on when to cite in common knowledge areas: specific details!
The Algalita Foundation, created by Charles Moore, PhD, educates and acts on the serious problem of ocean plastic. Recently, the scope expanded to address freshwater and brackish water. The Foundation identifies at least nine giant garbage patches in the Pacific Ocean alone. A recent study by the associated Charles Moore Research Institute noted that 67% of freshwater watersheds within 50 miles of cities at a threshold population level of 50,00 contained detectable microplastic residues (Shea, 2027).
The IPPC "Policymaker Summaries) between 2018-2023) warn about temperature rises above the modeled 1.5C by 2050. However, the 2023 Synthesis Report (Summary for Policymakers linked here) cautions that many scientists warn that the future may be more dire than modeled due to feedback loops within the ocean and air carbon cycles that are accelerating global change conditions. See especially, pages 4x-8q).
TBD in class.
Another resource can be this QA session from a previous class.
Happy Friday. More Nobel Prize news below. I will be available between
- 9-9:50
- 11-11:50
You have an Eli Review WRITING TASK due tonight (draft 2 of 3). Please respond so that you can participate in the REVIEWING TASK, which I will open mid day bases upon what alll y'all compose. That task is due Monday evening, as per usual. BE ON TIME FOR EACH OTHER! Hint: this is a make-or-brake moment for most in the class.
If you do not have ELMS mail grades/reflection from me re your rain garden memo, you MUST CONTACT ME ABOUT THIS assignment.
For chemistry: Congratulations to (Google Deep Mind CEO) Demis Hassabis (five minute interview video on Nobel site, includes transcript) and Dr. John Jumper (Nobel site; 3 minute video)for being awarded the 2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for their work developing AlphaFold, a groundbreaking AI system that predicts the 3D structure of proteins. Comp Sc+chemistry (lots of biochemistry in there). Good visual, courtesy of Compound Interest-->
Here is another visual, from the Nobel website-->
Some of you may have "played" Fold-It, a citizen science precursor to this AI-assisted protein study tool.
Also, did you see or try to see the northern lights last night? I did. Did not film well and you might have to know how to look. I grew up seeing them all the time. Search on images in Google, with Washington DC in your terms and you will be treated to a feast! Here is my little photo. Purple maroon above blue twilight. Made my Montana heart so glad.