_____________________________________
Being a chemist. Oops, science is POWERFUL!

ENGL 390, 390H, and (sometimes) 398V  Class Journal

_____________________________________

Week 4: Rain garden draft 2: shape of definition memo + sentence craft

Morning on this blustery day!

Do not forget your ER Reviewing Task due tonight (sent by ELMS mail/linked on ELMS calendar). Great work in these posts now.  Your job is learn about AI generated knowledge, prompting strategies, and checking AI by consulting authorative sources (not necessarily peer reviewed). More on that in class.

We are working throught the cognitive task of DEFINITION.  Here are some patterns outlined in a short Google doc. Aristotle wrote about definitions as an act of categorization.  We will focus on this move today AND arrange a set of paragraphs:

  • short working definition (para 1)
  • classification and context para (para 2 or 3)
  • detailed CAUSAL definition  (para 2 or 3)
  • evaluation paragraph (para 4, will require formal citation, TBD this week)

See how we can start to "sort" details from our invention into meaningful paragraphs?. Incidentally, this approach of short detail toward expanded detail is called the cognitive wedge. The cognitive wedge (my coinage in short illustrated Google doc one-pager0) relies on the Given-New concept (short article) from Halliday (wikipedia bio of distinguished British cognitive linguist) and others.  What I want you to note  from the article is that:

  • Given-New patterns reflect an awareness of human cognition
  • Good writers think carefully on what the audience knows and needs to know (MEMORY)
  • Given-new is one of many choices that writers make, with our judgement a key to making choices.
  • Hint: location in a document, paragraph, or sentence is strategic for writers and readers. 

The first part of this post concerns cognitive or critical thinking strategies about writing.  Let's look again at the Padlet I share on Writing Process Models (you do not need to do the exercises; you could, though, think!) -->

 

 

Slides (Google, 10)) to guide how we revise our writing generally are here. You can preview this presentation if you like but we will look at them all week in class. Recall that Friday is another ER Writing Task of your "pretty good" rain garden memo for peer revision in a Monday ER Reviewing Task.  Then, for Friday 28th, you tun in for a grade.  You will revise solo based on the ER platform work of this Friday (21st) and next Monday (24).

Let's focus on sentence strategies, a powerful writing craft tool.  Also, revising sentences from AI and other common knowledge sources gives you opportunity to add value to a search.  You can also avoid plagiarism charges by re-tooling sentences and arranging them in tight, focused paragraphs. Here are some for the week, in these short Google doc handouts (new to you): 

Sentence Patterns 

Buffy and Sentences

Pitch the Verb

And, on to paragraphs (short MS Word handouts) that we will take up starting Wednesday.

Paragraph Types/Definitions: think Architectures

Paragraph Types by purpose, from the field as in real paragraph  (longer doc)

Posted on Monday, February 17, 2025 at 06:27AM by Registered CommenterMarybeth Shea | Comments Off

Week 3: Canons->Invention about rain garden memo; Eli RevewI

Good morning!

Here we go toward Assignment 1: what is a rain garden aka the brief definition memo

  • Read/review my short Google lide set on Aristotle's canons; we we focus on invention aka deliberate research toward making a document.
  • Register/pay for Eli Review (about 22 clams).
  • Friday night-through Monday night is our first iteration of 
    • you write (post to the WRITING TASK in Eli Review by Friday 11:45);
    • Mb reads./crafts an Eli Review REVIEWING TASK midday Saturday; and
    • you respond by Monday evening, to the writing of others.

Note: You MUST do these tasks on time.  Imagine being at work and meeting the internal deadlines of colleagues to propel mutual work forward. I am flexible re your turning in work for a grade (the polished draft).  You will have a week.

In this first Eli Review (ER), we focus on invention.  And, we will reveal our path to ourselves and to others. Why? The new Writing Programs (English Department) guidelines call for me to have an AI policy and to teach/model professional practices in using AI to generate ideas and (gulp) text passages. More on that in class.

Here is our scenario for writing (look for audience, context, purpose elements)--> 

Transform the class into a small technical communication/science research group.  You work here, with colleagues (our class).  I am the research director.  Here is Jane, our boss. She asked for a rain garden overview memo at the end of our last staff meeting. First, what is a memo?

irst up! What is a memo?  

By the way, the OWL website at Purdue is a fabulous resource for writing. Memos also have a standard format:  See the image to the left.  Also, look at the email heading in your software.  This electronic message is based on the memo format.  

Bonus question:  what is the difference, traditionally, between a memo and a letter?

Now, to content.  What is rain garden?  Hint: Search on google (keep track of what search tems you use, what questions you type).  Spend 15 minutes tops.  We will discuss on Wednesday.

Some of you may want to go right to Wikipedia (try "rain garden" "low impact development" "bioremediation" as entry terms.

What do rain gardens look like "in the wild"? Search on "rain gardens" on campus to see a cornucopia of such installations.

Curious about the syllabus and AI policy?  Here are my working ideas (you will help me this semester refine this concept and what this looks like applied at school and work.

I understand and expect that students use AI, especially in the prewriting and invention phases of document generation. Some class activities  will require AI exploration. Learning to use AI is an emerging skill for students, teachers, and professionals. We will discuss AI options, in a “pearls and perils” approach  about how to leverage AI for our work. We will also try to anticipate how AI works in collaborative writing, copyright contexts, and professional ethics. We will also discuss the limits, cautions -- even dangers (perils)  of these software systems.

Professionalism  requires that users of AI reflect closely as they generate knowledge and craft texts with AI assistants. At a minimum, students are encouraged to pay close attention to information they use in their own work that is produced from AI, and explain how/what they use at the beginning of assignments. 

Emerging best practices include citation of AI. Science and technical context now use AI to point toward credible sources.  I expect that you use AI as a consultative resource to deal with complexity of technical knowledge.  However, you should be aware for many workplace documents, we will need to cite/source/credit AI knowledge and even particular ways of writing (sentences and paragraphs, for example) The use of AI should be properly documented and credited. For example, the material generated using ChatGPT-4 should include a citation such as: “Chat-GPT-4. (YYYY,Month DD of query). “Text of your query.” Generated using OpenAI. https://chat.openai.com/”

To promote transparency, every assignment that uses AI must include an "AI Acknowledgement" section. This section -- typically in a note heading the document -- should clearly explain how AI was employed in critical analysis work (prewriting, inventing ala Aristotle’s first canon) and in writing/using text, prose, etc. Hint: we will work to make the writing “yours” by adding evidence to claims via formation citation and by powerful information citation using cited referral links.

I want to acknowledge the English Department working group (am member) on AI in the classroom and Annette Vee, PhD, of the University of Pittsburgh English Department for this AI policy framework.

 

Posted on Monday, February 10, 2025 at 06:06AM by Registered CommenterMarybeth Shea | Comments Off

Week 2: Classical rhetoric frames to think about writing

Happy Monday!

We will go here, a link on this Squarespace site (Slides, under Visuals) to review ways to think about writing. We will work through most of this this week.  Hint: some of this material is familiar -- logos, pathos, ethos -- for example.  Other items will make sense because Aristotle's approach (mostly him but other Greeks like Plato, Socrates, and even Hermanagoras) reflect the way the human mind approaches complexity.  

Placing here the ones we start with-->

Aristotle's proofs or appeals: Logos, pathos, ethos

Three ways of thinking about audience (Aristotle-based, with modern gloss)

Set 1: Rhetorical Traingle of Audience, Context, Purpose

Set 2: Audience Analysis by Relationships (commentary on Set 1 frame; FIXED!)

Set 3: Booth's two triangles 

  Deepening audience analysis theory 

Burke's Pentad (Dramatism Approach)

Triangles to Information Theory (Shannon/early comp sci)

We will talk about the level of reading (Google Doc) required here, which is an important skill.  

We need to note -- however briefly -- how the code of science is under attack as is the US Constitution and our very government, from within (and without).

Did you complete the slide set (re-linking here)? Related: brief nod to how document design can help you read well, including here!

AI graphic case (via ChatGPT and Patron the explosives dog on Twitter). Here is his November '24 Twitter post re his request to the AI-->

Quick and ominous (pathos within analysis, which is logos) visual from studying how the Smoot-Hawley Act triggered the 1929/30 crash and depression. This image, widely reproduced is from the political economist Kindleberger (Wikipedia entry is good overview)-->

Image

Kindleberger Spiral

PREVIEW of Wed concerns Eli Review-->

Students

Tasks – the assignments

Posted on Monday, February 3, 2025 at 06:41AM by Registered CommenterMarybeth Shea | Comments Off

Hello to ENGL390, science writing, for SPRING 2025

Wednesday!

Hello,

This class journal is our primary lecture/notes/slides aka a text for our class.  I will post on Mondays, Wednesday, and Fridays throughout the semester.  We work off the posted material during our online sessions. 

We wiill try this for Friday in a fuller way.  As you experienced on Monday, we worked off the ELMS class announcement.

I am looking forward to this class (teaching Terps since 1987). Let's go.

Posted on Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 06:27AM by Registered CommenterMarybeth Shea | Comments Off

Week 15: Blues of the last day

Hello.  

I learned so much from all of you, both your content work and also ways of seeing students respond to prompts.  THANK YOU.

Details:

I will be available on MWF, per our usual schedule by digital link

9-9-50

11-11-50

until the end of finals.

I will answer questions today.  My primary request of you is to get into your ER Reviewing TASK.  You are either on the Atlanta Train or the Boulder Train.

To those who did not show up regularly to ER work, please plan to meet with me to chat about your last chance at labor grades.  You know who you are, said gently but truthfully.

Now to the two presentations of the day: one last visual communication idea about the importance of strong transitions. The second one is fun knowledge (11 slides)  about Amanita mushrooms and the flying Santa Claus stories.

 (two metaphors, chaining back to ABT work)

Now, on to more work thinking about transitions between paragraphs and even document sections. We have two metaphors for this.  First up?  muffin tin.

In the muffin tin metaphor, we chunk information into the tins, which is natural and good. We divide complex information to conquer the complexity.  Doing this heaving cognitive lifting is necessary for analysis and even uses of the information.  However, muffin tin "scoops" of information are largely the type of information that is joined by the conjunctive and. We have yet to introduction the powerful (also wakes up reader cognition) conjunctives of but (however) and or (contrast or choices or options). We have yet to introduce the power of therefore, where we create meaning and actions based on meaning.  Recall ABT work by Randy Olson and Trey Parker of South Park.

Theory pause: One of Aristotle's canons for writing is ARRANGEMENT.  The order and "chunking" of information matters very much for reader cognition and receptivity to what you write.

Now, the (Lego) train metaphor, where the cars are different, helping us think about and, but, or, and toward the end (caboose) of therefore.

 

For your possible enjoyment, I will post holiday images on MWF in this space, ALL UNDER THIS WEEK I leave week 15 up, thusly, so you can refer to this helpful information as you walk (stressed but confident) through the fire of finals.  On the other side is some rest. Remember, the frog force is with you.

Posted on Monday, December 9, 2024 at 07:29AM by Registered CommenterMarybeth Shea | Comments Off